| Graveyard - s/t |
| Written by Srikanth Panaman | |
| Sunday, 31 August 2008 | |
|
|
|
Graveyard - s/t
Aug 31 2008 23:59:42 This thread discusses the Content article: Graveyard - s/t
Woot! Sounds like something I could get into, seeing that Witchcraft scored pretty well for me. |
#6351 |
|
Re:Graveyard - s/t
Sep 30 2008 11:17:44 This didn't work for me at all. That's the problem with bands that are too rooted in music of a previous area (and I'm looking at you as well, thrash revivalists). There's too much of an attempt to sound exactly like their influences and absolutely nothing original brought to the table.
I think we are at an interesting crossroads in terms of a lot of the rock/metal of the sort the guys on this board listen to (I'm automatically excluding laughably awful shit like The Killers etc) You either have homages to the past done with varying degrees of competence (The Sword, Evile, Graveyard, Antarctic Abyss) or bands that are desperately trying to be 'experimental' by meshing several influences into the same song (Yakuza, Galexia, Between the buried and me etc). For me, the entire Sabbath-70s hard rock worship is yielding very diminishing returns. Of around 10 albums I check out in the course of the year, i'll like only maybe around 4 and actually want to own only around 2. The problem with something like Graveyard (and Sheavy last year) is it makes me wary of checking out other stuff in the genre because I find it so overwhelmingly dull, it casts a pall on the entire genre as it were. |
#6966 |
|
Re:Graveyard - s/t
Oct 05 2008 02:55:44 But isn't it good having the atavists around when you know for a fact that there are others trying different shit all the time? My personal take is if a band wants to ape their influences to a t, they should go for it. Unless a band is really interested in breaking away and forming their own sound, the end result (if they try something 'different') is mostly always going to be watered down. Still haven't heard this particular album, so I don't have a stand on that yet.
|
#7009 |
|
Re:Graveyard - s/t
Oct 05 2008 10:04:43 Hm yeah, but it also depends on what they bring to the genre. Too few bands doing the entire Sab worship gig are not even TRYING to be interesting.
For instance Oasis were unapologetic latter day Beatles clones and some of their songs - silly lyrics notwithstanding - did sound a fair deal like the latter day Beatles without giving you a sense of entire riffs/melodies being clumsily copy-pasted. I am essentially trying to contrast bands with a very strong 70s influence - The Hidden Hand for instance, to ones that I consider soulless clones - Sheavy and Graveyard. |
#7011 |
|
Re:Graveyard - s/t
Oct 05 2008 10:19:47 Heh, Graveyard doesn't even have much Sabbath in them. Totally different approach to songwriting.
|
#7012 |
| < Prev Article | Next Article> |
|---|