Popular of Late
Forum Latest
- Re:March's mind-bending movies & marvelous mon...
- Re:March Of The Mongoloids..(spins of the Month)
- Re:Muzak Hauls and Bargains
- Re:MBG Hauls & Bargains thread
- Re:Assorted Gaming News
- Re:Strategy and Adventure Gaming Grognards...
- Re:Have Game Will Play
- Re: Superjail!
- Re: For you Stoner Rock fans...
- Re:Road, Movie
Login / Logout
|
*Note: Contains regional references. International readers be forewarned!
Now that ordinarily speaking ought to disqualify me from writing about it. But Inland Empire is a vintage case of the egg you don't need to eat all the way through to realise it's gone bad. I had a strong feeling while getting into this film that it would in all probability suck something fierce. Bhalla(aka Kikuchiyo) who has a lot more patience with films than I do had given up and warned me about its essentially craptastic nature. And yet, I thought, perhaps he'd been too hasty. Maybe the movie wouldn't be all that bad. I should learn to step back and smack myself HARD when I start thinking like this. I recall being in a similar mood when I forked out some 20 sing $s I could ill afford to buy Metal Machine Music by Lou Reed.
Inland Empire is yet another oblique tribute to the Phallic Kingdom of Mallu porn (In Lund Empire Get it?) Unlike Malluholland Drive his previous MalPorn worship session, David Lynch's Inland Empire manages to hold viewer interest (or at least my interest - the bhalla claims to have passed out at the half hour mark) for at least 45 minutes.
It starts with random wankery - people jabbering away in Polish with no subtitles on offer and a weeping girl in a hotel room viewing what looks like amateur porn (AHA!).
And then some weird sitcom with people wearing rabbit masks cadged from Donnie Darko. Anyway this silliness soon gives way to a reasonably coherent and engrossing narrative about a weird old woman who pays a visit to an actress called Nikki (OR IS SHE? It's one of the many pointless mysteries in the film that Lynch fans are obsessing over all over the interwebs even as you read this). The woman betrays a great knowledge about Nikki's immediate future — a future that Nikki is suddenly and unaccountably transported to.
In the course of filming, she figures that her current feature is a remake of some doomed project which ended in the death of the principal characters when first attempted — some bogey-ridden Polish folk tale. But by now Lynch's pretensions overwhelm the film and it descends into total surrealistic garbage. And just to show you how fvking brvtal!!! he is, some of the surrealistic garbage is in Polish. It's the sort of nonsense that will mainly appeal to the "IT'S FUKENNN TRIPPPY!!! MAN, I'M SOOOO STOOOONED MAAAAAN, ASSHOLES!!!" public. Or annoying literature/film students who'd rather star in coprophilic porno than consider the fact that Lynch is an incomprehensible hack using his reputation for obliqueness to make films that are essentially a cinematic cocktease.
In this film, the fairly lush look that was one of MDrive's redeeming factors is replaced by amateurish video camera footage, a deliberate attempt at capturing the casual hokeyness and surrealism of the average Indian TV soap opera (People who've seen the Sutadi Sittan in Annamalai know what I'm talking about). But Lynch's slaverying fanpeople probably will see a bold defiant artistic statement even if he films himself picking his nose and getting deloused for seven hours straight.
As for me, I believe Lynch is driven by the same impulses as the Mallu porn industry: a monomanical obsession with incorporating certain sequences while everything else is negotiable. The only difference being that the Mallu porno flicks are generally better paced and far more fun. Probably because they, in their own warped way, seek to entertain and bask in the masturbatory glow of masturbation rather than the masturbatory glow of critical acclaim.
|
| More where this came from: | |
You need to login or register to post comments.

|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 19 2007 09:56:15 Not really. Check out his brilliant Elephant Man, the film about John Merrick. There's also a lot of praise for The Straight Story, I haven't seen it as yet.
And Lynch has made some terrific movies: I personally love Eraserhead, although it is very mood-dependent. Blue Velvet has some great moments, though I don't find Dennis Hopper's character as scary as some people make it out to be. I really like Wild at Heart, although the reviews are generally quite schizophrenic about it. And Dune is a difficult thing to assess...apparently Lynch's original cut was more than 5 hours and he was forced to drop more than half of it for the theatrical release. Everything after that has been studio-hack versions with no involvement from Lynch. And frankly, Herbert's novel in itself has a number of boring and badly written moments. The best reason to read Dune would be to get the necessary background for the sequel Dune Messiah, which comes across as awesome. |
#698 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 19 2007 10:59:09 I'd say the main problem with Lynch is he's playing to a gallery - it may be a relatively small gallery, but it makes a huge amount of noise. With every film he pushes the credibility and tolerance of his fans just to see how far he can go, and now, assured that he has an audience irrespective of WHAT he puts out, my guess is he's just become sloppy and lazy. He makes these totally random careless films and then says cute stuff like "Even I don't understand my films!" Like the films are being made not by him but by some great subconscious of Genius Itself that comes to the fore every time he's on the set.
Something like Eraserhead was very self indulgent and definitely not a film with all the ends wrapped up neatly, but worked for me because it had a palpable atmosphere of gloom and seemed like a nightmarish exaggeration of a few relatively commonplace anxieties. Blue Velvet and The Elephant Man, the only other films I've seen by him, were both relatively coherent -- though if you ask me BV is about as far as this 'everything's askew out here' approach can been taken without degenerating into the total chaos of Inland Empire. |
#702 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 19 2007 14:32:57 ravenus wrote:
And Dune is a difficult thing to assess...apparently Lynch's original cut was more than 5 hours and he was forced to drop more than half of it for the theatrical release. Everything after that has been studio-hack versions with no involvement from Lynch. And frankly, Herbert's novel in itself has a number of boring and badly written moments. The best reason to read Dune would be to get the necessary background for the sequel Dune Messiah, which comes across as awesome. While the characters in the novel Dune may have been a bit cardboardy, it made for a pretty good heroic sci-fi read. Granted, Dune Messiah is way more complex and has a better grasp of pathos (Princess Irulan, what a bitch!). Still, everything I saw from the movie was an EXACT re-enactment of the scenes from the book, down to the interior monologues, and it was done in this wooden, ham-handed manner that robbed the scene of any excitement at all. Having 3 extra hours of footage may have helped fix the jerky pacing of the studio release, but if you ask me, the movie has way more problems than that. |
#707 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 19 2007 18:52:11 Ya the movie has a lot more problems than that...and it's main problem is that it's an adaptation that should have never taken place. Herbert's first Dune book is a wordy stretched out affair that to me finds its greatest appeal in its concepts of ecological balance and the mechanics of the spice, not in its ham-fisted Bene Gesserit Jedi Mastah adventure.
Unfortunately, in the interest of film being primarily a visual medium, we see next to nothing in the film about either of these and more than we need of second-rate Jedi Mastah adventuring. My2 bits there |
#709 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 19 2007 21:22:35 Twin Peaks- Fire Walk with me is excellent and Lost Highway is worth a look
|
#710 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 20 2007 00:56:19 Well, I really loved Mulholland Drive, I think it's his most well-rounded film, it doesn't go over-exploratory or narcissistic. Also it had awesome cinematography and the super-cute Naomi Watts to boot, and lastly but not the least, being coherent. The next up would be The Elephant Man, you'd be lying if it didn't genuinely tickle your emotional sensors. I also liked Wild at Heart quite a lot, also Eraserhead wasn't all that bad, but I loathe Blue Velvet and Lost Highway with a passion. Both of them gave me the most frustrating and disappointing viewing experiences of my life, the only other ones I can think of right now is Scorcese's Taxi Driver and Raging Bull.
See, when you start out masturbating, you barely worry about the techniques. You jerk off with the sole intention of making the goo appear in whatever form it chooses to, but then later on, it all gets quite boring and you incorporate certain sudden sideway twists every 20 seconds anticipating something you haven't yet experienced. You put too much effort into all these trivialities, that the end-product definitely highlights those eccentricities. I guess that's the problem with Inland Empire, from what I've seen of certain 5 minute parts on youtube, it sure as hell is overdone and might as well irritate the calmest of the erudites. I haven't yet seen Dune or The Straight Story, but I hear the latter is his most free-flowing work as in it can be grasped even by a 5 year old at most. I'm currently downloading the Twin Peaks series, and from what I read on other film boards, it's a murder mystery primarily, then comes his usual surrealistic hoopla, rather than the latter taking the forefront as always. So, I have a feeling I'll dig it or at most everyone can dig it, 'cause Lynch's hardcore detractors, go onto say they tend to like most of it. The film is also vastly underrated going by their opinions. The only real beef I have with him is that he NEVER discusses anything about his film plots, explaining that the interpretations are exactly what each viewer decides to come up with, and that he himself doesn't know where and what it all starts. There's something very wrong about that. |
#714 |
|
Re:Inland Empire
Sep 20 2007 14:49:39 @Suresh: Fair enough. I'd have liked the movie if they kept the Jedi adventuring as lively as I'd felt in the book (and portrayed Paul as more of the bastard that he was). If they'd started with the trade guilds and ecology in detail, I suspect it'd have come off like the Star War prequels.
|
#727 |






