Forum Latest
- Re:July Reads & Views
- Re:July Morning and rest of the days spins...
- Re:Inception (dir. Christopher Nolan)
- Re:Muzak Hauls and Bargains
- Re:June Trade List!
- Re:MBG Hauls & Bargains thread
- Re:Kvlt Comix #1
- Re:Miscallenous hauls and bargains
- Re:The best and the rest of 2010
- Re:DC Webzine launches a record label - DC Rec...
Login / Logout
Latest Tags
|
Page 1 of 2
Coming to the story itself, Neil Gaiman, one of the people responsible for the script, has put interesting twists on canonic material before, as with his take on Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' and 'The Tempest' in the Sandman comics. Those re-readings worked because they were done with a modicum of respect and affection for the original source material. It was a way to revitalize old stories with fresh perspectives. Success and Hollywood salaries seem to have gone to his head, though. He, and his collaborator Roger Avary, did need to streamline the admittedly episodic narrative of the original to make for a tighter story, more suitable for the three-act sensibilities of the modern movie-goer. However, they've taken the opportunity to diss everything in the original story - it's as if they just scanned through the Cliff Notes and thought 'oh cool, a big scary monster! A dragon! Yay!' and hated everything else about the story.
|
| More where this came from: | |
You need to login or register to post comments.



