Follow us on Twitter
Error
  • AutoTweet NG Automator-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
  • AutoTweet NG Content-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
  • AutoTweet NG Kunena-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
Beowulf (dir. Robert Zemeckis)
Viewings
Written by Jayaprakash Satyamurthy   
Wednesday, 28 November 2007 13:39
Article Index
Beowulf (dir. Robert Zemeckis)
Page 2
All Pages

ImageThe original poem, 'Beowulf' may have been about a heroic man who killed fearsome monsters and saved a lot of people. But this adaptation is all about killing every trace of grandeur, heroism and wonderment in a very old story so that a bunch of over-paid hacks can strut their digital prowess and indulge in some smug post-modern revisionism.

First, the digital prowess. Motion-capture technology may be the way cinema will be made in the future; as of now, however, it is an idea whose time has not quite arrived. Presumably effective and probably expensive performances by some actors, including Anthony Hopkins and John Malkovich are essentially embedded in a pixel death-mask that sucks all the nuance and life out of their work. The expressive features of a real human being are replaced with the sort of slick visage that might qualify as pretty neat work in a purely animated context, but seem like a roundabout and expensive way to wind up with characters that look like avatars from a pricey RPG. The animation itself is not of a consistent quality - there's a sudden jump in expressiveness halfway through, as if the job was suddenly given to a better team. Grendel himself, the primary monster-at-hand, looks a bit ridiculous, like a poorly constructed plasticine model with a bad case of acne. The dragon, however, is rather gorgeous, which at least puts this movie a notch above Eragon, where even the dragon was crap.

 

Image 

 

Coming to the story itself, Neil Gaiman, one of the people responsible for the script, has put interesting twists on canonic material before, as with his take on Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' and 'The Tempest' in the Sandman comics. Those re-readings worked because they were done with a modicum of respect and affection for the original source material. It was a way to revitalize old stories with fresh perspectives. Success and Hollywood salaries seem to have gone to his head, though. He, and his collaborator Roger Avary, did need to streamline the admittedly episodic narrative of the original to make for a tighter story, more suitable for the three-act sensibilities of the modern movie-goer. However, they've taken the opportunity to diss everything in the original story - it's as if they just scanned through the Cliff Notes and thought 'oh cool, a big scary monster! A dragon! Yay!' and hated everything else about the story.

 



 

Our valuable member Jayaprakash Satyamurthy has been with us since Wednesday, 25 July 2007.

Show Other Articles Of This Author

More where this came from:

You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...

Home Reviews Viewings Beowulf (dir. Robert Zemeckis)