Forum Latest
- Re:July Reads & Views
- Re:July Morning and rest of the days spins...
- Re:Inception (dir. Christopher Nolan)
- Re:Muzak Hauls and Bargains
- Re:June Trade List!
- Re:MBG Hauls & Bargains thread
- Re:Kvlt Comix #1
- Re:Miscallenous hauls and bargains
- Re:The best and the rest of 2010
- Re:DC Webzine launches a record label - DC Rec...
Login / Logout
Latest Tags
|
|
After that opening, we see Aamir waking up in his flat and going to the bathroom where he takes off his shirt. You'll be seeing an embarrassing lot of that in this film. Tired of people's snide remarks about his underwhelming portrayal of a commando in Baazi, Mr. Khan has spent lots of extra time in the gym to look the badass for this film. He also has a crew cut with a fancy scar design and a permanent scowl. The sum total of these developments serve to accentuate his REALLY BIG EARS, and make him look like an ad for Isabgol. He expresses his bowel frustrations by yelling and waving his arms about, which make him look cute and hilarious.
Aamir's character also has “short term memory loss (STML)” and can remember things for only 15 minutes at a time, so he needs to take pictures and notes of everything. Given the monster-size plot holes in the film, this appears a contagious malaise transmitted also to writer-director A. Murugadoss and most other members of the cast. Apparently Mr. Isabgol was once not constipated but the well-heeled well-boweled honcho of a huge-ass UK based cellphone company. This early part of the film (referred to in diary entries that make Dracula's epistles seem spare and laconic) would have you believe that no one in India knows what this multi-millionaire NRI eligible bachelor with bulging pecs looks like. If one could only credit the Indian press with any sense of restraint, this might have been attributed to a reluctance to give coverage to some one who exclusively shops at Messrs. Reid & Faggot.
Hereon, Reid & Faggot falls for a girl with a personality that suggests the scraping of fingernails on a blackboard (Asin), even pretending to be a penniless aspiring model that would do underwear shoots to get a break. After what seems like some 7 hours worth of Asin-ine pratfalls, the STML afflicted script finally gets around to telling you how the clouds of darkness shrouded our hero's life of sunshine and regular shits - His girlfriend gets (for all practical purposes) bloodlessly bludgeoned by an evil punju named Ghajini. This is of course something that everyone in the audience already knows from looking at the posters showing Aamir's tattooed torso. I know it's the telling that matters, but there's something rank and obscene about the time this film takes just to return you to square one. Hi-ho then, Mr. Isabgol wants nothing more than to gut Ghajini and relieve his constipation. Somewhere in this mix is the most clueless medical student in this world (Jiah Khan). Initially interested in Isabgol as a case study (she seems to pretty much ignore her actual studies), she ends up helping him in his quest to hunt down the big G. This leads to the climax which, with its focus on hand-to-hands and bad guys somersaulting away in every which direction, is one of the few exciting segments of this otherwise foot-to-mouth venture. There would have been more of a cause celebre if it had been arranged for Ms. Medical Student to undergo a live autopsy. Sadly, like with the rest of Ghajini, we are left frustrated.
|
| More where this came from: | |
You need to login or register to post comments.

|
Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 06 2009 00:42:07 This thread discusses the Content article: Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Some good has come of much evil. This review like the MAD parodies in the days of yore is ample compensation for having sat through over three hours of that turdlike film. |
#8481 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 06 2009 01:37:47 Aamir's character also has “short term memory loss (STML)” and can remember things for only 15 minutes at a time, so he needs to take pictures and notes of everything. Given the monster-size plot holes in the film, this appears a contagious malaise transmitted also to writer-director A. Murugadoss and most other members of the cast.
Haahaha! Classy burn there, and great review! Seeing as how I haven't watched anything for a while now, saying I'm going to be avoiding this like the plague is a bit redundant. |
#8483 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 06 2009 11:01:36 I was never going to watch it having seen the tamil one. Strange though, people like my cousins are hating this hindi version even though they loved the other. Either ways, cool review and this is where I'll stop as far as this shit is concerned.
|
#8484 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 06 2009 21:32:23 Kick-ass review! And yeah, not touching either this movie or the Tamil one by a 6 foot pole.
|
#8491 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 06 2009 23:33:30 that last photo looked like a zombie out of blood.
|
#8501 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 07 2009 00:26:56 It's a pic of one of those Aamir Khan mannequins they have installed at theaters screening Ghajini, so ya, it is a zombie out of blood.
|
#8505 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 07 2009 10:40:58 Funneh review. This is soon going to be the highest-grossing film in Bollywood of all time when it hits and possibly crosses the 100 crore mark.
|
#8508 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 07 2009 11:05:51 Hardly. Tr00 brutality always wins out in the end. Gadar is still tops and I doubt Gayjini will ever see that kind of monies.
|
#8509 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 07 2009 16:59:04 May be Murugadoss needs to have 17 attempts at remakes before he gets Ghajini right?
|
#8518 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 07 2009 17:24:47 Kikuchiyo wrote:
Hardly. Tr00 brutality always wins out in the end. Gadar is still tops and I doubt Gayjini will ever see that kind of monies. It is supposedly the 8th highest grosser of all time. |
#8523 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 08 2009 00:34:44 Kikuchiyo wrote:
Hardly. Tr00 brutality always wins out in the end. Gadar is still tops and I doubt Gayjini will ever see that kind of monies. Ghajini is just 6 crore away from Gadar's place. |
#8537 |
|
Re:Ghajini 2008 (dir. A. Murugadoss)
Jan 08 2009 01:49:53 ^I don't know where you guys are getting these figures from but at this point just about every thing you hear is inflated beyond imagination. The real net gross figures come out only a couple of months after release when a film's done its first run in theaters.
It's a huge hit ofcourse, biggest of last year definitely, but it remains to be seen how well it sustains itself. A lot of these figures get boosted thanks to the uber expensive ticket prices at the plexes and the revenue sharing there is very complicated unlike the older films. |
#8542 |








